Problems Of Modern Youth Essay

It has been rightly said that we go by the first unity-half of our get laids trying to understand the older extension, and the second half trying understand the unfledgeder generation. This is nothing peculiar to the modern senesce. It has continuously been so. Every age has its own problem Youth has eternally matt-up aroundwhat exasperated with age, and age In always been suspicious of offspring. With their congenital ebullience a impatience, a majority of young people is penetrating to act and date on the own rather than be direct by the experience of their elders. The ok people, being more at headquarters with words rather than with action, oft make noises about the problems of youth. In forevery(prenominal) generation, old men ar found shaking their hoary heads and cover nostalgic about I good old days when young people knew better and showed due cultism to age and tradition. In only ages, whenever they arouse pondered over ways of youth, they draw fore e ssayn nothing but ruin staring the existence in its present. And yet the world goes on.Every generation passes from spontaneity and exuberance of youth to the caution and prudence of old age, and hence yields place to the next. Some of the charges brought against modern youth atomic number 18 that they represent a rudderless generation without any ideals to live by, or cause to live for. Without the redeeming influence of faith, they are afflicted with a compulsive reverence which manifests itself in increa sing defiance of parental authority and revolt against established social, moral and behavioral norms. On the s unaffixedest pretext they take to the streets, indulging in violence and destruction. They want to pull back attention to themselves through unconventional demeanour and clothes. A majority of them have fallen victims to self-pity, mister med as alienation. They are bonnie a generation of drug addicts and have developed an aversion to honest, grave work, ever on the lookout to have something for nothing. It is no longer ardent youth passing forth into a hostile world.Now, it is hostile youth overtaking forth into an anxious world, which is not sure, what to expect from it. This is a terrible list of charges and it will require an army of psychologists to ascertain the truth of the allegations do and to analyze the erratic behaviour patterns referred to. But even from the laymans point of view, the indictment appears to be patently one-sided. It betrays a lose of beneficent understanding and realistic appreciation of the dilemma in which the younger generation finds itself today. If we come to think of it,it is not that only the younger generation is note restless. As a matter of fact, human society itself is in a order of flux. And that is not a recent development. A profound vary has been coming over it for the last quarter of a century. It started with those who had fought in the moment world War. They had been brought up in an atmosphere impregnated by conformism. But later they had borne the brunt of fighting for seven long years, their outlook was radically changed.They came to acquire a rather equivocal attitude towards established authority as likewise towards long-accepted social mores and codes of conduct. They had seen the death and destruction shaped by the war. It diminished their evaluate for the wisdom of old age because it was the old mentheir fatherswho had started the war. The catastrophes of death and destruction, which had visited the world twice in thirty years eloquently, showed that the old had bungled, and that their claims to matur wisdom were false. because the general erosion of law and order, which is natural in whiles of war, wrought a profound change in the spirit of the age. An attitude of protest and irreverence came to replace spontaneous faith and quiet acceptance of the placement quo. Thus, it was the old people themselves who sowed the seeds of that arrogance of which they complain so bitterly firearm discussing modern youth.A fast-growing populations has increased to complexities of life in our times and the fantastic scientific progress triggered off by the Second mankind War. These two factors combined have brought about great socio-political changes during the last 3 decades, both in the industrialized countries of the west and in the underdeveloped countries in Asia and Africa. Growing affluence in the developed societies of the West has generated among the people thither a restlessness, which pines for instant rewards. Pursuing the mirage, parents have little time to confide to their children and to properly direct and supervise their activities. The children have all the gold they need, and seldom face the need to work for a living. The result is that they try to attract attention in other ways and seek excitement in drugs and permissiveness. In the underdeveloped countries also, young people are feeling disgruntle because the ir visions of a happy future are being obliterated both by internal strife or by political opportunism. rattling few among such countries are enjoying political stability and even in them, more often than not, it is a particular class which is cornering most of therewards of technological progress. This provokes the young to protest against rampant corruption in society and the abnegation of social justice. In the circumstances, is it to be wondered at if all talk of committal to ideals, renewed moral vigour, basic virtues etc. leaves the young cold and dubious? They are no longer prepared to blindly accept whatsoever their elders choose to ram down their throats. They are prone to subject to small review all the social and political values they are called upon to accept. When they see high-sounding principles invariably being ignored for expediency, political leaders on purpose hoodwinking the masses, vested interests being allowed to frustrate the state at every step, corru ption joint in high places and other gaping contrasts between promise and performance, they course become cynical and clamour for change. Students form a very weighty group among the youth of all nations.Like the others in the same age group, they too have ample reason to be dissatisfied with the state of affairs in our educational institutions. Their biggest and most legitimate grievance is that what they learn after putting in so much time, effort and money has very little relevance to the realities of life with which they come face to face after leaving the university. Rather than equipping them to make a good living, education appears to be rendering them unemployable. Therefore, it is but natural that they should want to have a say in determining what should be taught so that it has some relevance to their future life and its needs. They would no longer tolerate politickers masquerading as teachers. They are not prepared to concede that the educational authorities have also to act as the guardians of their morals. They consider themselves quite capable of looking at after themselves. If we look at the problems of youth today in the light of foregoing, it will be apparent that it is not the young alone who are to blame for the state of mind in which we find them.They may sanitary be charged with being ignorant of what they want. But they surely agnize what they do not want. Theirs is a movement of protest against hypocrisy and lack of integrity in their elders, an expression of moral revulsion against corruption in society. Students are up in arms against displays of hollow pedantry and alienated cognition in educational institutions, the lack of living contact between students and teachers, and the deadness of the whole educational system to the need for change. The young are protesting against the difference between themyth and reality of the society in which they are growing. Evidently, this line of work for the future and this anxiety to resc ue life from hypocrisy is very commendable indeed. But it cannot be said that the young are all the time guided by such high purpose, or that their choice of methods is always happy. Dissent is necessaryin fact obligatory, when things go wrong. But when it descends from the communicatory level to the physical, it invites tragedy. vehemence comes natural to youth. The young, supremely sure that the authority against which they are up in arms is unjust and oppressive, and feeling certain of the rightness of their own stand, react emotionally. The intensity of their feelings is such that it fills them with hatred and they turn to violence. Those who counsellor taking to the streets to give vent to feelings of grievance plead that no one pays attention to words any longer. But this way of thinking is dangerous. Violence is an expression of intolerance. As the President of the Yale University said some time ago, the ugliness of the radical is no different from the ugliness of the rea ctionary. Both share the sin of arrogance, which is the enemy of freedom. In a general unleashing of violence, dissent is the first casualty.On the whole, the younger generation today is much misunderstood and more maligned than it deserves. The world, which it is going to inherit, will be immensely more exciting than the world of its predecessors ever was or could be. At the same time, life will present to it a much bigger and far more complex challenge. It would not do to condemn it and find fault with it that is easy enough. What is really important is that it is set with understanding so that it can develop its faculties to reshape the world it is going to inherit in accordance with its noblest vision.